|
Service |
|
|
|
More Info |
|
|
|
Features |
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
New |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tire Data
|
|
Quite often we
at Air Free get asked as to whether or not we have
any technical data on our tires. Starting in
February of 2001, we contracted with a firm in
England to begin testing our tires so that we may
improve the design and performance. Since our target
market is the avid cyclist, the performance needs of
that demo are more acute than the
recreational/occasional cyclist. As more data
becomes available we will make it available here. In
this special section we will attempt to explain the
testing procedures and interpret the results.
The chart to the right represents a sample of
popular high end rubber tires which have been
tested. All tires, rubber and urethane ones are
tested exactly alike so that the results are
relative to one another. The columns displayed are
the Tire Name, Tire Size, psi and crr. The Tire Name
and Tire Size are self explanatory. The psi of the
rubber tires given are at the point where the tire
had the lowest rolling resistance except for the Air
Free tires. The crr is the technical term for the
coefficient of rolling resistance and the lower the
number the better.
HR - is our High Resilient Formula
Std - is our Standard Foam |
|
|
TireName |
TireSize |
psi |
crr |
|
Vredestein Fortezza Piste |
700 x 23c |
145 |
0.0041 |
|
Michelin Axial Supercomp |
700 x 20c |
110 |
0.0045 |
|
Conti Grand Prix 3000 Silica |
700 x 23c |
120 |
0.0055 |
|
Continental Grand Prix 3000 |
700 x 28c |
125 |
0.0060 |
|
Michelin Tracer |
700 x 25c |
90 |
0.0061 |
|
Michelin Tracer |
700 x 25c |
100 |
0.0062 |
|
Michelin Axial PRO |
700 x 20c |
110 |
0.0062 |
|
Michelin Axial PRO |
700 x 23c |
110 |
0.0063 |
|
Conti Supersport Ultra |
700 x 18c |
135 |
0.0065 |
|
Michelin World Tour |
700 x 28c |
100 |
0.0065 |
|
Hutchinson HP 25 |
700 x 25c |
110 |
0.0067 |
|
Conti Grand Prix foldable |
700 x 23c |
120 |
0.0067 |
|
Michelin World Tour |
700 x 28c |
85 |
0.0071 |
|
Michelin World Tour |
700 x 28c |
85 |
0.0071 |
|
Air Free LeMans Sprint HR |
700 x 25c |
110 |
0.0076 |
|
Air Free LeMans Sprint HR Shaved |
700 x 25c |
110 |
0.0078 |
|
Hutchinson HP 20 |
700 x 20c |
110 |
0.0085 |
|
Conti Top Touring |
700 x 32c |
70 |
0.0087 |
|
Air Free Lemans Sprint HR Shaved |
700 x 25c |
45 |
0.0111 |
|
Air Free LeMans Sprint HR |
700 x 25c |
45 |
0.0118 |
|
Air Free Daytona HP Std |
700 x 20c |
120 |
0.0157 |
|
Air Free Daytona TT Std |
700 x 20c |
140 |
0.0165 |
|
Air Free Lemans Sprint Std |
700 x 25c |
100 |
0.0168 |
|
Greentyre Racer |
700 x 20c |
100 |
0.0221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above
chart shows that the crr of the LeMans Sprint is on
par with the high quality rubber tires. Even though
some rubber tires have lower rolling resistance a
good many more have higher rolling resistance. One
should not conclude that one tire is better than the
other simply because of rolling resistance crr
numbers as the watts required to propel the bike are
very close to one another and can be seen on the
watts chart. Other factors affecting performance are
discussed below and in the
'Ask Hugh' section. |
|
|
|
|
Tire Shape and Contact Patch
Relationship |
|
In this section we
will deal with our research into lowering rolling resistance
and the role that the shape of the tire will play. As we
progress, we will start to see how incremental changes in
the crr of tires will dictate changes in the amount of
energy required to propel the bike and increases and
decreases in the time it takes to get from point A to point
B. Then we will look at tire deflection and how it
influences performance and finally we examine rotational
weight and include a spreadsheet for you to perform your own
calculations. |
|
|
|
 |
|
The
High Resilient material allows us to experiment with
differing shapes. |
 |
|
|
|
The tire we
are using for our example is the Air Free LeMans
Sprint made with our High Resilient material at
about 45-50psi and the tire was loaded with a 112
pound weight. We can see that the unmodified tire
(171-A) has a crr value of .0118 which is very good
for a tire of such low psi. The next step was to
shave off the center groove which resulted in a
wider contact patch and the crr decreased. The
lowest crr achieved came from tire 171-C. Tire no.
171-D had its' crr value increase by altering the
shape to a point. This caused an increase in the
hysterisis (inefficient movement) which doubled the
rolling resistance. The last tire 171-E was
virtually even with 171-C but has a better
footprint. When we examine the footprint of a tire
we are looking to see if an oval emerges. This oval
would show that more of the load is being
distributed across the tire which decreases the
hysterisis and improves performance. It is not
unusual to see wider tires out perform thinner ones
in the crr value. |
|
|
For example,
the tire to the right is a Michelin 20" tire that is
44mm wide and recorded the lowest rolling resistance
ever by our contracted lab. Notice that the oval is
much more pronounced at 50psi than it is at 90psi.
Just by looking at these two foot prints, one could
easily assume that the 50psi is much faster than the
90psi one. Our future designs will incorporate an
oval foot print by widening the tire and making it
lower in profile. With a slight curvature in the
middle, the more weight that is applied, the wider
the foot print will be. |
 |
|
|
 |
The second
aspect of a tires performance as it relates to speed
is how responsive it is. We have seen that low psi
tires can have better rolling resistance, such as
when coasting, but in a sprint or hill climb
situation, lower psi tires will sap energy. Looking
at the chart to left, the red line is an Air Free
tire made with our standard foam. Notice that it
doesn't fully recover after the last set of weight
is taken off of the tire. Even though the crr of
that same tire is better than some rubber tires, its
inability to fully recover has led to assertions
that airless tires can be sluggish. On the other
hand, our tire made with the High Resilient material
at 45 psi very closely resembles the deflection
rates of high pressure rubber tires as seen by the
yellow and blue lines.
|
|
|
The Michelin
tire tested is fairly representative of the high
quality rubber tires in that high quality rubber
tires for the most part, will want to fully come
back to the original position. However the
deflection rates increase sharply when lowering the
psi of rubber tires. The more the tire travels back
and forth, the more energy is required to overcome
this and is the reason why avid cyclists would keep
higher psi in their tires. While the Air Free HR
tire has technically a slightly higher rolling
resistance value, it is plain to see that when
stressing or loading the tire, it will be as easy to
propel as the Michelin racing tire at a much higher
psi. This bodes well for us because this means as we
increase the density of the HR material, the crr
value goes down and the deflection curve will show
that the HR material will exceed the rubber tire in
its ability to totally reconform itself after
loading. These deflections are measured by taking
predetermined weights and placing them in on the
tire in increasing increments and then removing the
weights and measuring the deflections each step of
the way. To see a partial list of tires tested, please
click here |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|